These guidelines govern everything published on Finvora. They exist so readers can judge our work by a stated standard rather than by assumption.
Sourcing
Market data comes from institutional-grade feeds and is timestamped at the moment of writing. Economic figures are attributed to the issuing statistical agency or central bank. Where a piece relies on a named analyst, bank research note or official statement, that source is identified in the text. We do not publish market-moving claims sourced to anonymous social media accounts.
Analysis and price levels
Technical pieces must state the timeframe being analysed, the levels that define the thesis and the level at which the thesis is wrong. Forecasts are framed as scenarios with conditions attached, never as certainties. Contributors do not describe an outcome as guaranteed, and we do not publish claimed win rates or performance figures that cannot be independently verified.
Conflicts of interest
Contributors disclose any position they hold in an instrument they write about, and may not open or close a position in that instrument on the day their piece is published. Commercial partnerships are disclosed at the point they are relevant. No advertiser sees editorial content before publication or has any right of approval over it.
Corrections
Substantive errors are corrected in the article body with a dated note explaining what changed. Typographical fixes are made silently. Articles are never quietly deleted to hide a call that did not work.
Use of automated tools
We use software to assemble market data tables, monitor price feeds and check copy. Every article is written, edited and approved by a human contributor who is accountable for its content. Where an automated tool has materially assisted in producing a piece, that is stated on the page.
Reader contact
Questions about a specific article, requests for correction and right-of-reply enquiries all go through the contact page and are answered by the editorial desk.